• Home
  • About
  • Podcast
  • Papers
  • Books
  • Keynotes
by david on June 18th, 2010

Leading or Managing

Great managers are not just leaders-in-waiting. This article from Marcus Buckingham and Curtis Coffman explores a vital different between leaders and managers.

Leading or Managing? – GMJ

3 Responses

  1. I am growing tired of this leadership management debate.
    Management is a form of leadership.
    In the same way that grape is a fruit. You do not eat fruit you eat a grape, apple, orange, etc…
    Same with leadership – management is an attribute/form/substance whatever of leadership.
    Great managers lead, and great leaders manage.

    Essentially what the debate stems from is what you get paid to do?

    By michael cardus on June 18, 2010 at 3:11 pm #  ()
  2. Managers work in the system…leaders work on the system. It’s the leaders that create the work for the managers to perform in order for the producers to contribute to the organization. The methodology has been around for quite some time, hence there really is no debate.

    By Geoff Snyder on June 18, 2010 at 7:42 pm #  ()
  3. I’m more aligned with Geoff. I don’t know that management is a form of leadership. Management was created to supervisor factory workers and keep system running smoothly. Leadership is about leading people to new places, or creating new systems. Same thing: no. Perhaps two sides of the same coin.

    By david on June 21, 2010 at 11:08 am #  ()

SUBSCRIBERS

32,658 | Twitter + RSS

SEARCH

Related Articles

  • 0302 | Marcus Buckingham
  • Book Review: StandOut
  • Front-line versus Top-down
  • Strengths-Based Leadership Theory

Categories

  • LeaderLab
  • LeaderLab Papers
  • LeaderLab Podcast
  • LeaderLab Press

Meta

  • Log in
  • Entries RSS
  • Comments RSS
  • WordPress.org

Website developed by Zach Bunn | WordPress Theme by TentBlogger | ©2012 LeaderLab